For a list of deceased wikipedians, see wikipedia:Deceased wikipedians. Further information: wikipedia:User pages wikipedia is not a social networking service like facebook or Twitter. You may not host your own website, blog, wiki, résumé, or cloud on wikipedia. Wikipedia pages, including those in user space, are not: Personal web pages. Wikipedians have individual user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to work on the encyclopedia. Limited autobiographical information is allowed, but user pages do not serve as personal webpages, blogs, or repositories for large amounts of material irrelevant to collaborating on wikipedia. If you want to post your résumé or make a personal webpage, please use one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet service provider. The focus of user pages should not be social networking or amusement, but rather providing a foundation for effective collaboration.
Advertisement essays : examples, topics, questions
See wikipedia:External links for some guidelines. Internal links, except for disambiguation pages when an article title is ambiguous, and for lists for browsing or to assist with article organization and navigation; for these, bubble please follow relevant guidance at wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists, wikipedia:Stand-alone lists and wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists. Public domain or other source material such as entire books or source code, original historical documents, letters, laws, proclamations, and other source material that are only useful when presented with their original, unmodified wording. Complete copies of primary sources may go into wikisource, but not on wikipedia. Public domain resources such as the 1911 Encyclopædia britannica may be used to add content to an article (see plagiarism guideline: Public-domain sources for guidelines on doing so). See also wikipedia:Do not include the full text of lengthy primary sources and wikisource's inclusion policy. Photographs or media files with no accompanying text. If you are interested in presenting a picture, please provide an encyclopedic context, or consider adding it to wikimedia commons. If a picture comes from a public domain source on a website, then books consider adding it to wikipedia:Images with missing articles or wikipedia:Public domain image resources. Wikipedia is not a blog, web hosting service, social networking service, or memorial site "WP:memorial" redirects here.
Contributors must disclose any payments they receive for editing wikipedia. See also wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Non-disruptive statements of opinion on presentation internal wikipedia policies and guidelines may be made on user pages and within the wikipedia: namespace, as they are relevant to the current and future operation of the project. However, article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views on a subject (see wikipedia:Talk page guidelines ). Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files wikipedia is neither a mirror nor a repository of links, images, or media files. 3 wikipedia articles are not merely collections of: External links or Internet directories. There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
Advertising, marketing or public relations. Information about companies and products must be written in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery. All article topics must be verifiable with independent, third-party sources, so articles about very small garage bands or local companies are typically salon unacceptable. Wikipedia articles about a company or organization are not an extension of their website or other social media marketing efforts. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify notable organizations which are the topic of the article. Wikipedia neither endorses organizations nor runs affiliate programs. See also wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) for guidelines on corporate notability. Those promoting causes or events, or issuing public service announcements, even if noncommercial, should use a forum other than wikipedia to.
However, wikipedia's sister project wikinews allows commentaries on its articles. Scandal mongering, promoting things "heard through the grapevine" or gossiping. Articles and content about living people are required to meet an especially high standard, as they may otherwise be libellous or infringe the subjects' right to privacy. Articles must not be written purely to attack the reputation of another person. It can be tempting to write about yourself or projects in which you have a strong personal involvement. However, remember that the standards for encyclopedic articles apply to such pages just like any other. This includes the requirement to maintain a neutral point of view, which can be difficult when writing about yourself or about projects close to you. Creating overly abundant links and references to autobiographical sources is unacceptable. See wikipedia:Autobiography, wikipedia:Notability and wikipedia:Conflict of interest.
Essay samples on Marketing
If you wish to ask a specific question on a topic, wikipedia has a reference desk ; questions should be asked there rather than on talk pages. Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion "WP:promotion" redirects here. For other pages about advertising and promotion, see wikipedia:Advertising. For the soap Operas wikiproject, see wikipedia:wikiproject soap Operas. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda, advertising and showcasing. This applies to usernames, articles, categories, files, talk page discussions, templates, and user pages. Therefore, content hosted in wikipedia is not for: Advocacy, propaganda, or recruitment of any kind: commercial, political, scientific, religious, national, sports-related, or otherwise.
An article can report objectively about such things, as long as an attempt is made to describe the topic from a neutral point of view. You might wish to start a blog or visit a forum if you want to convince people of the merits of your opinions. Although some topics, particularly those concerning current visa affairs and politics, may stir passions and tempt people to "climb soapboxes wikipedia is not the medium for this. Articles must be balanced to put entries, especially for current events, in a reasonable perspective, and represent a neutral point of view. Furthermore, wikipedia authors should strive to write articles that will not quickly become obsolete.
Per our policy on original research, please do not use wikipedia for any of the following: Primary (original) research, such as proposing theories and solutions, original ideas, defining terms, coining new words, etc. If you have completed primary research on a topic, your results should be published in other venues, such as peer-reviewed journals, other printed forms, open research, or respected online publications. Wikipedia can report your work after it is published and becomes part of accepted knowledge; however, citations of reliable sources are needed to demonstrate that material is verifiable, and not merely the editor's opinion. If you or a friend invented a drinking game, a new type of dance move, or even the word frindle, it is not notable enough to be given an article until multiple, independent, and reliable secondary sources report. Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Personal essays that state your particular feelings about a topic (rather than the opinions of experts).
Although wikipedia is supposed to compile human knowledge, it is not a vehicle to make personal opinions become part of such knowledge. In the unusual situation where the opinions of an individual are important enough to discuss, it is preferable to let other people write about them. (Personal essays on wikipedia-related topics are welcome in your user namespace or on the meta-wiki.) Discussion forums. Please try to stay on the task of creating an encyclopedia. You can chat with people about wikipedia-related topics on their user talk pages, and should resolve problems with articles on the relevant talk pages, but please do not take discussion into articles. In addition, bear in mind that article talk pages exist solely to discuss how to improve articles; they are not for general discussion about the subject of the article, nor are they a help desk for obtaining instructions or technical assistance. Material unsuitable for talk pages may be subject to removal per the talk page guidelines.
Write your own story about anyone who has been bullied
See "wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal" below for more information. For a wiki that is a collection of textbooks, visit our sister project wikibooks. Prescriptive guides for prospective speakers of a language should be transwikied there. Visit wiktionary, our sister project, if you want to help build a dictionary. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought "WP:forum" redirects here. You may be looking for wikipedia:Forum shopping or wikipedia:Village pump. Wikipedia is not a place to publish your assignment own thoughts and analyses or to publish new information.
Dictionary definitions should be transwikied there. Encyclopedia articles are about a person, or a group, a concept, a place, a thing, an event, etc. In some cases, a word or phrase itself may be an encyclopedic subject, such as Macedonia (terminology) or truthiness. However, articles rarely, if ever, contain more than one distinct definition or usage of the article's title. Articles about the cultural freshers or mathematical significance of individual numbers are also acceptable. Usage, slang, or idiom guides. Descriptive articles about languages, dialects, or types of slang (such as Klingon language, cockney, or leet ) are desirable. Prescriptive guides for prospective speakers of such languages are not.
merits of several classes of entries, consensus is that the following are good examples of what wikipedia is not. The examples under each section are not intended to be exhaustive. Wikipedia is not a dictionary main page: wikipedia:wikipedia is not a dictionary wikipedia is not a dictionary, or a usage or jargon guide. Wikipedia articles are not: Definitions. Articles should begin with a good definition or description, but articles that contain nothing more than a definition should be expanded with additional encyclopedic content. If they cannot be expanded beyond a definition, wikipedia is not the place for them. In some cases, the definition of a word may be an encyclopedic subject, such as the definition of planet. For a wiki that is a dictionary, visit our sister project wiktionary.
Other than verifiability and database the other points presented on this page, there is no practical limit to the number of topics wikipedia can cover or the total amount of content. However, there is an important distinction between what can be done, and what should be done, which is covered under. Consequently, this policy is not a free pass for inclusion: articles must abide by the appropriate content policies, particularly those covered in the five pillars. Keeping articles to a reasonable size is important for wikipedia's accessibility, especially for dial-up and mobile browser readers, since it directly affects page download time (see wikipedia:Article size ). Splitting long articles and leaving adequate summaries is a natural part of growth for a topic (see wikipedia:Summary style ). Some topics are covered by print encyclopedias only in short, static articles, but wikipedia can include more information, provide more external links, and update more quickly. Encyclopedic content Information should not be included in this encyclopedia solely because it is true or useful.
Business News The Chronicle herald
Wikipedia policy about what is not acceptable in the online encyclopedia "WP:NOT" redirects here. For wikipedia's notability guidelines, see. For other uses of! In wikipedia jargon, see. For wikipedia's democratic structures, see. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia and, as a means to that end, an online community of write individuals interested in building and using a high-quality encyclopedia in a spirit of mutual respect. Therefore, there are certain things that wikipedia is not. Contents 1 Style and format 2 Encyclopedic content.1 wikipedia is not a dictionary.2 wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought.3 wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion.4 wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images. Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, but a digital encyclopedia project.