Some officials, including Defense minister Karl Theodor zu guttenburg and Education Minister Anette Schavan, resigned. Others, like european Parliament member Sylvana koch-Mehrin, were deprived of their degrees. The analysis of these individuals dissertations was conducted by a group of activists who launched a wiki-service called VroniPlag. It was their example that inspired Andrei rostovtsev to create dissernet. In light of the recent events, it is worth paying attention to the stir that has recently rocked the Education Ministry after it sought to combat low-quality research work. On April 22, a group of lawmakers from a just Russia, the liberal Democratic Party, and the communist Party filed a request to the president asking him to fire Education Minister Dmitri livanov because of his unsatisfactory work. Shortly before that, the same group had filed a similar request to the prime minister, but Dmitri medvedev rejected it and cut the conversation short by saying that the minister is not a banknote to be liked by everyone.
Ivan Ilyin, putins Philosopher of Russian Fascism
As Parkhomenko notes, Igoshin used imagination in replacing the terms: Chocolate, without any other indications, turned into meat in general. White chocolate became russian beef. Regular milk chocolate became imported beef. Elegant dark chocolate turned into cunning bone-in beef of any origin. Thus, having done the easy task of search and replace in someone elses dissertation, Igoshin managed to get. Finally, the scandal that caused most of the stir involved the dissertation of Childrens Ombudsman pavel Astakhov, entitled Juridical Conflicts and Contemporary forms of Their Resolutions (Theoretic and Legal Study). In April, parkhomenko published the results of another investigation (conducted by dissernet experts) of Astakhovs dissertation, which was shown to be almost entirely falsified. As Dissernet representatives noted, Astakhovs dissertation synthesized a number of small texts that were borrowed from more than a dozen sources into one consistent narrative. Nevertheless, there were no official reactions to any of these investigations. The plagiarizers ignored the allegations and continued occupying their posts as if nothing amendment had happened. As a relevant comparison, we might examine a similar chain of scandals involving politicians and officials that has recently taken place in Germany but has had quite different consequences for those involved.
In February 2013, the writing antiplagiarism campaign gained the support of Sergei parkhomenko, a prominent Russian journalist. Parkhomenko published the results of the investigation in his popular blogs on livejournal (under the nickname cook) and on the websites of Ekho moskvy and, which gave the campaign added publicity. Vladimir Burmatov (left) and Dmitri livanov. In early march, parkhomenko published the results of another Dissernet investigation. This time, united Russia lawmaker Igor Igoshin was caught for having plagiarized parts of his dissertation. Igoshins case is a veritable joke. The main body of his text, entitled Increasing Competitiveness of Enterprises on the basis of Implementation of Their Market Potential (The case of food Industry is borrowed from the dissertation of Natalia orlova, entitled Market Potential as a basis for Competitiveness of Confectionary Enterprises. But instead of examining chocolate (as Orlova did Igoshin focused on beef. Aside from the change in terms, there are hardly any differences between the two texts.
But in January 2013, the ministry issued an official reply stating that dissertations that were defended more than three years ago could not be subjected to such an investigation. Burmatov denied all allegations, but in light of the scandal, he had to resign his deputy chairmanship of the duma Education Committee. Also, upon request of the Prosecutors Office, he had to resign from his position of chair at the Plekhanov school, because the investigation also revealed that he lacked the necessary experience in teaching. The cases of Andriyanov and Burmatov started a full-scale campaign of exposing plagiarized dissertations of officials and politicians. Some of these cases seem more like absurdist anecdotes than reality. In late february 2013, portions of the dissertation of Igor Lebedev, deputy speaker of the State duma, member of the nationalist Liberal Democratic Party, and son of the partys permanent leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky, were found to have been plagiarized. Blogger Andrei rostovtsev reported that Lebedevs dissertation, entitled evolution of Ideological Bases and Strategies of the parties of the russian Federation in 19922003, was to a large extent plagiarized from the dissertation of mikhail Kornev, entitled Dominating Factors of Party-building in Contemporary russia, which was. According to rostovtsevs analysis, about 30 percent of the introduction of Lebedevs dissertation (about 10 pages 100 percent of the first chapter (50 pages and 80 percent of the conclusion (6 pages) were taken from Kornevs best work. Later, it was revealed that in addition to being a doctor of history, lebedev also held a candidate degree in sociology, but information about his candidacy daddy dissertation was missing even from the archives of the russian State library, where, according to hac rules, all defended.
Gorkavys initiative was taken up by another blogger, nicknamed hyperhov, a creator. Idioteka journal who specializes in exposing pseudo-experts. Hyperhov inspected Burmatovs dissertation and discovered that about 12 pages of text were taken verbatim from the dissertation of lyubov nesterova, entitled Formation of Information Culture of Future Engineers of the forest Industry in the course of Humanitarian Studies, and about seven pages were taken. Pedagogika journal in 2004. But it was after the dissertation was put through the dissernet verification system (a tool developed by Andrei rostovtsev, also a prominent physicist and blogger, whose nickname is afrikanbo) that it became clear that Burmatovs dissertation was almost entirely copied from a work by Alexander. The main difference between the two was that the phrase political culture used in Dragunovs dissertation was replaced by the phrase information culture in Burmatovs work. Based on these data, state duma deputies Dmitri gudkov, ilya ponomaryov, and Vladimir Bessonov forwarded an inquiry to the Prosecutors Office in order to investigate possible fraud. Konstantin Terekhov, an attorney who works with civil projects RosPil and RosEuroSud, filed a request with the Education Ministry to call for an investigation and to see if Burmatovs dissertation was plagiarized.
Russian Rulers History - russia's rich and beautiful
Dissertation was on history (entitled Student movement in the social and Political Life of Moscow in 19912008). It is also noteworthy that 32-year-old Andriyanov was Vladimir Putins proxy in the presidential election. Right after Putins election win in March 2012, Andriyanov was appointed to head the prestigious boarding school, which has a special focus on physics and mathematics. A switzerland year earlier, Andriyanov had also headed the student union of msu and under the name of his alma mater became a member of the pro-putin All-Russia peoples Front—a fact that caused resentment among students and professors. Despite the fact that Andriyanov denied having plagiarized others work in his dissertation, a special commission created by the Education Ministry discovered that his work involved multiple violations of the universitys procedures. Also, the dissertation contained numerous chunks of text that were taken verbatim from various sources without indicating that they were"d material. In February 2013, after the ministrys commission finished its investigation, Andriyanov was deprived of his.
D., along with 10 other people, including a number of midlevel officials such as head of Moscows Zamoskvorechye district Nonna Kharitonova, advisor to the moscow Department of External and International Relations Galina Aliluyko, and chief-of-staff to the Astrakhan Ombudsman Daniar Batrashev. It became clear that Burmatovs dissertation was almost entirely copied from a work by Alexander Dragunov. The dissertation of United Russia legislator Vladimir Burmatov was the next focus of the series of plagiarism scandals. Burmatovs work, entitled Formation of the Information Culture of Students in the Activities of the University mass Media on the basis of the culturological Approach, was defended in 2006. At the end of november 2012, the prominent Russian astrophysicist and doctor of physics and mathematics nikolai gorkavy, who runs a popular blog on livejournal under the nickname don_beaver, noticed similarities between Burmatovs career and that of young guard Andriyanov (Andriyanov was a member. Bloggers attempts to find Burmatovs dissertation abstract and academic articles were futile, despite the fact that Burmatov was a public figure: he occupied the positions of deputy chair of the State dumas Education Committee and chair of political and social studies at the Plekhanov economic.
At the same time, the number of purchased dissertations and pseudo-scientific works also increased. Alexander Abarinov, a member of the russian Academy of Education, distinguished between three types of dissertations in Russia: those that are real, those that are fake, and those that are dull. Real dissertations contain new knowledge, and the research is thoroughly conducted. Fake dissertations are written using plagiarized texts, both by classically copy-pasting texts written by other authors, and by a mutual agreement between the original author and the plagiarizer to commit plagiary, he wrote. In Abarinovs estimation, 15 to 20 percent of all dissertations fall into each of the first two categories. But there is a third category—dull dissertations.
Their authors mastered the scientific writing style, and all they do is just ramble on about nothing. This might be the most representative group of dissertations, Abarinov pointed out. As it turns out, those in positions of authority were most shameless in inserting plagiarized material into their dissertations. Living under the extremely cynical conditions of the russian political system, hardly any russian citizen believes that most officials and politicians wrote their dissertations and scientific works by themselves. Lulled by the benefits that the putin period of stagnation has accrued to consumers, the public has been indifferent to politics for a long time. But after Russian bloggers initiated an anticorruption campaign and the thinking part of the public experienced a significant moment of awakening at the end of 2011 that resulted in mass protests, it was time to expose the plagiarizers. It all began in november 2012, when a group of alumni of the kolmogorov specialized Education and Scientific Center at Moscow State University (MSU) noticed that the bibliography of the dissertation abstract of the centers director, Andrei andriyanov, listed articles that were published in nonexistent. It was also suspicious that Andriyanov graduated from msus Department of Chemistry, but his.
Russian Scientists Explain 'novichok' - high Time for
Meanwhile, the Brookings researchers who came up with this discovery became alarmed by the media night attention and explained that the text pieces in Putins dissertation were not borrowed by direct copy-paste, but were rather consciously rephrased. Still, the fact that Putin had copied the original text into his dissertation without mentioning the source was indisputable: More than 16 pages worth of text out of a shredder nearly 20-page segment were taken verbatim from King and Cleland, Brookings experts said. The scandal over Putins dissertation led nowhere. But because the head of states deed had no repercussions whatsoever, a new trend emerged in the country: plagiarism in the writing and defense of dissertation works began on an unprecedented scale. Those in positions of authority were most shameless in inserting plagiarized material into their dissertations. Speaking out in 2007, mikhail Kirpichnikov, then head of the russian Higher Attestation Commission (hac publicly acknowledged the problem. He said that starting in the early 1990s, the number of defended dissertations in Russia dramatically increased, while their quality drastically dropped.
Education Minister Dmitri livanov ended up at the center adventures of the stir. Imr advisor Olga Khvostunova discusses why the authenticity of the dissertations has become a political issue. The ongoing exposure of public officials plagiarized dissertations that has been gaining momentum in the last few months in Russia creates an opportunity to glimpse yet another dimension of Russian political reality and the unlimited lies that comprise its core. The first high-profile scandal of this kind took place a while ago—in March 2006, when Clifford Gaddy and Igor Danchenko, fellows at the Brookings Institute in Washington dc, published the results of their research on the authenticity of Russian President Vladimir Putins. Gaddy and Danchenko discovered that significant pieces of the theoretical chapter of Putins work, entitled Strategic Planning of the reproduction of the mineral Resource base of a region under Conditions of the formation of Market Relations, which was defended in 1997, were either copied verbatim. Strategic Planning and Policy by william King and david Cleland. Most of the leading world media picked up the news that Putins dissertation was plagiarized, but the russian president never dignified the reports with any comment.
wrote the thing in the first case, this is a clear diploma-mill-type operation. This is a dissertation, paid for, made-to-order.". Although Gaddy and Danchenko set out searching for Putin's views on economics and sustainable development, they noticed in reading his dissertation that certain sections seemed out of place. The only English language source in the text was King and Cleland's book. In the translation from Russia to English of the dissertation, text was discovered that came from that book without credit. King and Cleland have no plans to sue. Vladimir Putin's Dissertation reference at the russian State library: retrieved from " ". Russia has been shaken by a series of scandals concerning the exposure of plagiarism in the dissertations of politicians and officials. Verification of the authenticity of their research was initiated by a group of bloggers and coincided with a reform launched by the Education Ministry that aimed at reducing the number of inefficient universities in Russia.
Cleland, was published in 1979. Brookings Institution researchers, clifford Gaddy and Igor Danchenko claim that Putin's dissertation, which earned him a candidate's degree in economics from the. Petersburg Mining Institute, copies almost verbatim from the text. Gaddy states, "I'm convinced that Putin did read that textbook. This is exactly the style of governing the country summary that he has used in Russia. He's actually taking their ideas and treating Russia as if it's a corporation - 'russia incorporated. Many russian government officials at the time would pay a ghostwriter for such publications, as gaining a degree could add legitimacy to one's governing policy.
Course modules catalogue university of southampton
From wikinews, the free news source you can write! Jump to navigation, jump to search, researchers at paper the. Brookings Institution, a non-profit think tank located in Washington. C., have recently accused Russian President. Vladimir Putin of making improper use of almost 16 pages and six figures from a 1982 translation of a 1978 textbook in his economics dissertation. Strategic Planning and Policy, written by, university of Pittsburgh professors William. King and david.